Canonical: https://www.playbookrg.com/review/

Description: Upload program evidence, assess it against your responsible gambling framework with AI, track gaps, and share your accreditation standing.

> Static reading copy of the published page, including authored disclosures. Interactive controls, personalized state, and account data are not reproduced. Use the canonical page for interaction and citations, and the dedicated content feeds for complete resource inventories. Source terms still apply; this format does not extend the Brand CC0 license to other products or third-party material.

Playbook Review

# Program review. Supported by AI.

Upload program evidence. Review maps it to your framework, assesses each criterion with AI, and shows your accreditation standing.

[See how it works](<https://www.playbookrg.com/review/#journey>)

1. ## Add your evidence

   Upload documents or import web pages. AI maps the evidence to criteria in your chosen framework.
2. ## Run the assessment

   Score the evidence against the rubric. Inspect the rationale, supporting sources, and gaps for each criterion.
3. ## Track and share

   See priorities and accreditation standing. Update evidence, reassess, and choose when to publish your credential profile.

The Playbook RG framework

## One view of your program.

Criterion assessments roll up into practice areas, domains, and overall standing. Playbook RG covers these five domains; other supported frameworks use their own scoring rules.

1. ### Information

   Can players understand the games, their activity, and the available help?
2. ### Tools

   Can players find and use the tools for managing their gambling?
3. ### Support

   Are support pathways in place, and is the response documented?
4. ### Operations

   Are staff prepared, responsibilities covered, and working practices maintained?
5. ### Governance

   Who owns the program, reviews its evidence, and decides what needs to change?

## Share your standing.

Publish a credential profile with your current standing and verification status. Evidence files and assessment rationales stay in the workspace.

Quality tiers, external review, and changes

### What the labels mean

- **Committed.** Implementation is still in progress.
- **Reviewed.** At the applicable standard.
- **Reviewed with Distinction.** Additional demonstrated strength.

“Reviewed” is a quality label; check the verification status separately. Other frameworks may use different labels.

### External verification

A reviewer can examine the evidence and record a separate decision with a rationale. AI assessment and independent verification are distinct. External review is arranged separately.

### Keep the assessment current

Add revised evidence and re-run scoring. Review keeps assessment history and identifies changes since earlier sign-off.

Your next step

## Bring your program into view.

Open Review or discuss an assessment for your organization.

[Explore Review](<https://review.gamblingpolicy.com/welcome>)[Discuss an assessment →](<mailto:info@gamblingpolicy.com?subject=Playbook%20Review%20assessment%20inquiry>)

[Create an account](<https://review.gamblingpolicy.com/sign-up>)[Sign in](<https://review.gamblingpolicy.com/login>)

Workspace access requires an account. External review is arranged separately.